In yet another mystifying move, Yahoo’s board fired Carol Bartz and ended her three year tenure as CEO. Over the last three years, Bartz has had to clean up after the less than stellar leadership of both Jerry Yang and Terry Semel led to revenue slowdowns, management bloat, product missteps, and who knows what else.
While I’m saddened to see Bartz go, I’m more aggravated by the ridiculous articles and blogs regarding Yahoo’s past, present, and future. Note to the mainstream press…Yahoo IS NOT Google. Yahoo is NOT Facebook.
Yahoo IS an Internet icon, a portal destination, an information and communications hub, and is chalk full of popular services and offerings. Often seen as less innovative than Google, Yahoo has made meaningful contributions to Hadoop and has recently open sourced Traffic Server which was acquired as part of the Inktomi acquisition.
I see two paths for Yahoo; Baidu and Apple.
Baidu has grown into a formidable challenger to Google. For Baidu to take the next step they must enter the Western marketplace and Yahoo would be the perfect vehicle to make this a reality. A cash and talent infusion by Baidu would reinvigorate Yahoo giving it new life to innovate and disrupt its way to revenue growth. It would also mean an end to Yahoo’s partnership with Microsoft (or would it) as well as new competitive efforts across traditional and mobile solutions.
Apple is a dominant force within the mobile/tablet community and Yahoo would make the perfect destination for their users. With one brush of the pen, Yahoo would be folded under the Apple brand and would change the perception of Yahoo from old/dying to new/exciting. Apple could use Yahoo as a platform for iCloud services and revamp Yahoo’s offerings to work seamlessly within iOS and OSX. Additionally, Apple could use Yahoo to offer new and innovative Cloud services and accelerate the adoption of HTML5.
In the end, Bartz will come-up a winner in this mess as her honesty and toughness is refreshing. However, the future for Yahoo may be bright as long as the Board realizes it’s time to turn the reigns over and sell the company. Let’s hope they don’t turn down an offer like they had from Microsoft again and Yahoo finds a new home!
Last week, yet another Cloud initiative began as the Open Cloud Initiative (OCI) launched from OSCON 2011 in Portland, Oregon. The OCI bills itself as a non-profit organization to advocate standards-based Open Cloud Computing. The OCI hopes to provide a legal framework based on the Open Cloud Principles Document (OCP) and apply them to Cloud computing products and services.
While conspiracy theorists will call this the “One Cloud” movement, the reality is there is little to worry about. An OCI without Amazon, Microsoft, Verizon, AT&T, and more isn’t really an assembly of “leaders of Cloud computing” but more of an ideology. Academics and Open Source aside, there is very little motivation for Cloud providers to work together other than standard connectivity and a few APIs.
The biggest force in promoting the OCI’s self-proclaimed slogan of “A non-profit advocate of open cloud computing” is actually another truly powerful Open Source Movements called OpenStack. As OpenStack adoption continues to increase, they may become the defacto standard for building Clouds. OpenStack is the core platform that allows Enterprises and Service Providers to build value-added software and/or services to create new and unique offerings or businesses to their customers.
It is the difference between “talking” and “action”. While some in this industry like to debate the merits of Cloud computing and interoperability, others are creating and innovating. I have already mentioned the OpenStack movement and its importance to Cloud computing, and no conversation on this subject would be relevant without talking about Amazon.
Amazon is rapidly innovating within Cloud computing while continuing to disrupt the industry, drop their published prices, and make money. Instead of getting caught up in all this debate, Amazon is setting their agenda and putting the entire industry on the defensive. In fact, their rate of innovation is astounding while their rate of adoption is actually accelerating. What is their motivation to interoperate with other Cloud providers? As long as they have open and defined APIs into the private clouds (VMware, Microsoft, Xen, KVM) of their Enterprise customers, then they are all set.
Altruistic goals cannot be confused with the capitalistic reality of the world we live in. The OCI may have great intentions, but they plenty of work to do to make themselves relevant within an Amazon and OpenStack world.