Dell Avoids Aster and Dodges a 296 Million Dollar Mistake

Another one bites the dust as Teradata has acquired Aster Data for a reported $263 million.  This represents 89% of Aster Data shares as Teradata already owned 11% of Aster bringing the true acquisition cost to $296 million or $275 million after subtracting Aster’s $21 million in cash.  In any case, that’s a lot of money for a company of Aster’s age and size.

For Teradata this acquisition makes sense as they continue to compete against HP (Vertica), IBM (Netezza), EMC (Greenplum), Oracle, and SAP (HANA).  Teradata is faced with an age-old question for technology companies; hold on to their proprietary ways of the past or reach for the open and commoditized ways of the future.  It is not clear to me which direction Teradata will choose. However, it is clear to me that, unlike Dell, Teradata is the right company in the right industry to make such a gamble on Aster; the database guru’s at Aster, Tazo Argyros and Mayank Bawa, will find themselves at home within the halls of Teradata.

While I applaud Dell for continuing to blaze their own path, it seems others within the technical community are harder to please.  Per Gigaom’s Stacey Higginbotham’s article posted on March 3, 2011:

So for Dell, and any other big data wannabes out there, the only proven options left to
start
fulfilling this niche are ParAccel, Infobright, and Ingres’s VectorWise Platform.”

I’d hardly call Dell a “big data wannabe” and perhaps some have misconstrued their attempted acquisition of 3Par as a precursor to Dell entering this space.  In fact, Dell has been quite clear that any software acquisitions must have an impact on their strategic lines of business.  While Aster and other big data start-ups have the potential of driving Dell’s server and storage sales, their valuations and competitive landscapes make them a risky move for Dell.

Dell is quickly becoming the king of “Cloud Neutrality” as they are providing key pieces of the solution to their customers while working with various infrastructure providers such as Juniper, Cisco, and more. By purchasing disruptive Cloud software companies within the areas of management, orchestration, security, and monitoring, Dell could further their leadership in this market.  Think the completion of UEC; very exciting!

Since I’ve never started a billion dollar company from my dorm room, I’ll defer to Michael Dell to make the right moves for his company.  Perhaps they’ll enter the big data market with a smaller software acquisition and integrate it into other cloud offerings thereby indirectly attacking the market.  For now, Teradata has gotten a bit stronger while Dell has avoided a $296 million mistake.

Quick Alert: EMC Scores With Greenplum; Can Cisco UCS Be Far Behind?

EMC is acquiring privately held Greenplum for an undisclosed sum.  Greenplum is a next generation warehousing database that offers massively parallel processing (MPP) and Scatter/Gather Streaming to provide analytics for private and public clouds.  Greenplum is an x86 based software solution that is challenging the likes of Oracle, Netezza, and Teradata. 

Interestingly enough, Oracle is an investor of Greenplum via their acquisition of Sun.  However, Oracle’s Exadata solution that is built on Sun hardware made Greenplum an expendable investment.  Meanwhile, EMC saw the opportunity to gain a foothold into this growing billion dollar market while continuing to fuel their storage business; huge databases equal huge storage requirements.

In the end, EMC has acquired a solid company that has held their own against their larger rivals.  With EMC’s ability to execute with a tenacious sales force, market presence, and stable financials coupled with new investments in the technology, Greenplum is sure to flourish.  Additionally, could a Cisco UCS appliance be far behind?

Think about it, traditionally data warehouses sit in their own silo within the data center.  One may argue this is because of the proprietary nature of these important systems, but this is slowly changing.   In Greenplum’s case they support Linux and Sun Solaris running on hardware from Dell, HP, Sun, and IBM.  Imagine EMC, in conjunction with VMware, fine tuning Greenplum’s software to work within Cisco’s UCS.  Instantly, you have a next generation data warehouse within a next generation data center architecture that gains all the benefits from Cisco’s UCS.

Google gets the Hype; Oracle and IBM get the Business

Google announced a new on-line database called Fusion Tables using technology they acquired from Transformic.  Transformic pioneered the use of data-spaces; a technology that has been around since the early 1990s.  Unfortunately, this technology was “useless” until the great brains at Google got their hands on it and now it’s going to shake up the entire database market.

It obvious to some writers and analysts, that Google has better talent than Oracle and IBM combined.  After-all, they now have data-spaces and Fusion.  Does Oracle or IBM have this? Wait, Oracle has Fusion; are we looking at a lawsuit? What about Teradata or Aster Data or Greenplum, or Postgress, or MySQL, or Netezza, or EnterpriseDB, do they have it?  If Google has it you can bet it’s better than everyone else’s.

Why is it that Google can do no wrong?  Search, Adds, Maps, Email, IM, Calendar, Web Sites, Phones,  Free Lunches, Video, Blogs, Free Dinners, Databases, Home Power Management, and, let’s all keep our fingers crossed, Netbooks.  Google should just buy Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle outright and put them out of their misery.

Let’s get the facts straight.  Oracle and IBM are dynamic companies that rule the database market.  In fact, Oracle and IBM have diversified products and services that are helping them through this tough economy.  Additionally, they have advanced R&D, patents, deep pockets, and access to the world’s largest and most powerful enterprises.  Finally, they are keenly aware of cloud computing and what that means to their businesses; i.e. databases.

Google has Advertisements.  While Ads are a great thing, hopefully one day people will rise up and say enough.  Enough profiling, enough storing information, enough analysis, enough of collecting personal data, enough, enough, enough.   Perhaps Google should look to improve their core businesses because the competition is heating up for Search and Ads.

Google get’s the hype; Oracle and IBM get the business.

Oracle’s To Do List

In the high stakes of M&A chicken, Oracle has stolen Sun from IBM and has changed the IT landscape forever. While this makes for great headlines, the hard work has yet to be started.

To do list (not complete):

* Pump life into Sun’s workforce
* Reassure Sun’s customers
* Calm Sun’s channel
* Dismantle Sun’s executive management team
* Triage Sun’s product portfolio
* Integrate, Integrate, Integrate
* Market, Market, Market
* Embrace the Open Source Community
* Provide a vision for Java, GlassFish, OpenOffice, VirtualBox, etc.
* Disrupt Cisco, HP, and IBM
* Attack the storage and storage back-up markets
* Attack Netezza and Teradata
* Promote Oracle 3.0: The Application Centric Datacenter
* Use Oracle’s Market Power to change the IT Paradigm

If Larry really wants to challenge Cisco, HP and IBM, he needs two more pieces; a top-of-the-rack switch and a next generation datacenter switch. Look no further than Arista Networks and Woven Systems.

Finally, would Oracle dare to disrupt the industry with an innovative pricing model? Would they take a loss on equipment for lucrative software and maintenance revenue? Or, do they show the world how Open Source Software can make money without inhibiting the community? Oracle in a box or a cloud?

Success or failure will be determined by Larry’s team and his will. Do this right and this industry will never be the same. Do this wrong, and the critics, IBM, HP, and Cisco will smile from sea to shinning sea. It’s hard to bet against Oracle and Larry Ellison and I’m not betting against this Iron Man of Tech.

The Sun Shines on Oracle

What a way to start the day as the Sun is shining bright on Oracle! Ellison has guts, vision, a good management team, and the cash to swoop in and throw the DB, Virtualization, storage, and server market on its head.

Oracle and Solaris are like bread and butter. Oracle gets to defend their high-end database deployments by ensuring that Solaris has a future. They also pick up MySQL and overnight they go form open source wannabe to an open source powerhouse. They also get access to Sun’s investment in Greenplum (petabyte data warehousing). Additionally, Oracle has opened a front against HP, IBM, and Cisco by combining not only selling applications, but also hardware.

However the real gems are Sun’s virtualizaton and datacenter solutions. Oracle now has the ability to compete head-to-head with VMware, Citrix, Red Hat, and Microsoft for virtualizaton supremacy. They now own Sun’s xVM products and solutions that are cutting-edge. Finally, Oracle has the ability to compete with Cisco’s datacenter vision by not only packaging routing/switching/storage but also applications into a virtualized system.

Mark your calendars, April 20th 2009 may become the day IBM regrets for years to come. If Cisco can’t get their hands on VMware, they may be stuck in the what-could-have-been blues. HP must adjust to new competition and Dell has got to be thinking what-about-us? Netezza, HP, and Teradata have awoke to a significant change in the industry and stronger competitor. Finally, this industry may never be the same as a software giant has entered the hardware business.

Sun needs three things to be successful; the right management team (check), the right strategy (check), and market reach and power (check). Who would have ever thought Oracle would break the software only paradigm? More M&A to come, but hats-off to Oracle.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 270 other followers

%d bloggers like this: